Monitoring Solutions for Every Team
From DevOps engineers to CIOs — I&B Monitoring Platform gives each team the context they need to act fast.
DevOps / SRE Teams
Pains
-
Alert fatigue — thousands of metrics and flapping alerts make it impossible to identify what actually requires action.
-
Slow root-cause discovery — correlating data across infrastructure layers, services, and business units is manual and time-consuming.
-
Dashboard maintenance overhead — building and updating dashboards for every product and service consumes valuable engineering time.
-
Tool sprawl — running multiple monitoring solutions creates blind spots, inconsistent data, and context-switching.
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Intelligent alert correlation delivers one actionable alert per incident, cutting through noise without losing signal.
-
The Service Details dashboard surfaces all related metrics, events, and thresholds in a single view — accelerating root-cause analysis across every layer.
-
Pre-built templates for Linux, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes, and more reduce monitoring setup from weeks to hours.
-
A unified data model across infrastructure, services, and business layers eliminates tool sprawl and data silos.
Engineering Teams (Application Developers, QA, Service Owners)
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Automatic issue creation in Jira, Zendesk, and Zoho Desk — pre-populated with correlated events and metrics — accelerates investigation and assignment.
-
Business-to-resource hierarchy pinpoints whether a problem originates in the application layer or deeper infrastructure components.
-
Real-time impact mapping identifies which business units or KPIs are affected, helping engineers prioritize the most critical fixes first.
Pains
-
Unclear service status — difficult to determine whether an issue originates in application code, infrastructure, or an external dependency.
-
Delayed incident response — manually creating issues in Jira, Zendesk, or Zoho Desk slows assignment and resolution.
-
No visibility into business impact — engineers lack insight into which incidents are affecting critical business functions or customer SLAs.
Operations / Infrastructure Teams
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Event grouping by infrastructure layer and service provides immediate clarity on which specific resource is failing and why.
-
Automatic incident assignment routes issues to the responsible engineer based on alert type and service ownership — no manual triage required.
-
Pre-built exporters and monitoring templates enable rapid onboarding of new infrastructure components from day one.
Pains
-
Metric volume overload — servers, containers, and network devices generate continuous data streams with no built-in prioritization.
-
Slow escalation paths — identifying the right owner for a failing resource takes too long during an active incident.
-
Delayed monitoring rollouts — manually configuring exporters and dashboards for new infrastructure slows deployment timelines.
Security Teams
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Unified monitoring across business, service, and resource layers provides full operational context for every security event.
-
Real-time cross-layer correlation of performance anomalies and service disruptions helps identify potential threats earlier in the attack chain.
-
A consolidated events and alerts list — spanning every layer and resource — streamlines investigation and reduces false positives.
Pains
-
Missing operational context — security alerts often arrive without correlation to infrastructure performance or service health.
-
Delayed anomaly detection — without cross-layer visibility, performance degradations that signal attacks go unnoticed until damage is done.
-
Fragmented investigation data — reconstructing an incident timeline requires pulling data from multiple disconnected systems.
CTO / Technology Leadership
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Business-centric dashboards and KPI views give technology leadership a real-time picture of how infrastructure performance affects revenue and critical services.
-
Cross-layer visibility from resources to business outcomes supports data-driven investment decisions and capacity planning conversations.
-
Standardized role-based dashboards ensure consistent, reliable reporting from engineering teams to executive stakeholders.
Pains
-
No business-level visibility — difficult to translate technical incidents into quantified business risk or revenue impact.
-
Slow strategic decision-making — fragmented data across tools makes it hard to allocate resources or justify infrastructure investments.
-
Manual executive reporting — preparing board-level IT performance reports requires aggregating data from multiple disconnected systems.
Top Management / Business Unit Managers / Business Process Owners
How I&B monitoring Solves It
-
Business-centric dashboards connect incidents directly to financial KPIs, customer SLAs, and process outcomes — in real time.
-
Impact mapping shows which business units, products, or customer segments are affected by any infrastructure or service issue.
-
Automated incident correlation identifies the accountable process owner or team for faster escalation and resolution.
-
Consolidated cross-layer reporting supports board-level visibility and provides evidence-based justification for IT investments.
Pains
-
No link between IT incidents and business KPIs — hard to quantify the revenue impact, customer SLA risk, or operational cost of a service degradation.
-
Slow risk assessment — decision-making stalls when data from IT, finance, and operations is siloed across separate systems.
-
Unclear accountability — difficult to identify which business unit or process owner is responsible when an outage or degradation occurs.
-
Weak ROI justification — investments in IT improvements lack a direct, demonstrable connection to business outcomes.