top of page

I&B Monitoring

Delivering Value: Pains Solved for Every Team

Understand how our unified monitoring solution eliminates fragmentation, accelerates root-cause analysis, and aligns technology performance with core business outcomes.

🎛DevOps / SRE Teams

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Smart alert grouping and correlation reduce noise and deliver one actionable alert per incident.

  • Context dashboards show all related metrics and events in a single view for fast root-cause analysis.

  • Automatic dashboards and ready-made templates (Linux, PostgreSQL, Kubernetes, etc.) cut setup from weeks to hours.

  • Single Source of Truth eliminates data silos.

Pains

  • Alert fatigue and noise – Thousands of metrics and flapping alerts make it hard to identify what really matters.

  • Slow root-cause discovery – Correlating data across infrastructure, services, and business layers is time-consuming.

  • Manual dashboard maintenance – Building and updating products' dashboards consumes valuable engineering time.

  • Fragmented tools – Using multiple monitoring solutions leads to blind spots and inconsistent data.

🧑‍💻Engineering Teams (Application Developers, QA, Service Owners)

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Automatic issue creation in Jira/GitLab with all correlated events and metrics accelerate investigation.

  • Business-to-resource hierarchy shows whether a problem originates in the application layer or lower infrastructure.

  • Real-time impact mapping highlights which business units or KPIs are affected, helping engineers prioritize fixes.

Pains

  • Unclear service status – Hard to tell if a bug report stems from application code, infrastructure, or an external dependency.

  • Delayed incident response – Manual creation of Jira/GitLab issues slows down assignment and resolution.

  • Limited visibility into business impact – Engineers often lack insight into which incidents threaten critical business functions.

⚙️Operations / Infrastructure Teams

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Event grouping by layer and service provides immediate clarity on which resource is failing.

  • Automatic assignment of responsible engineer speeds escalation.

  • Pre-built templates and exporters capture key metrics instantly, enabling rapid onboarding of new infrastructure.

Pains

  • Overwhelming metric volume – Servers, containers, and network devices produce endless data with no clear prioritization.

  • Difficult escalation paths – Identifying the right owner for a failing resource takes too long.

  • Slow deployment of new monitoring – Manual configuration of exporters and dashboards delays rollouts.

🛡️Security Teams

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Unified monitoring across business, service, and resource layers provides operational context for security events.

  • Real-time correlation of performance and service anomalies helps spot potential attacks earlier.

  • Single Source of Truth streamlines investigations and reduces false positives.

Pains

  • Limited operational context for security incidents – Security alerts often lack correlation with infrastructure or service performance.

  • Delayed detection of anomalous behavior – Without cross-layer visibility, performance anomalies that indicate attacks can go unnoticed.

  • No single truth across teams – Security investigations require pulling data from multiple systems.

📊CTO / Technology Leadership

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Business-centric dashboards and KPIs give leadership a clear, real-time view of IT impact on revenue and critical services.

  • Business-centric dashboards and KPIs give leadership a clear, real-time view of IT impact on revenue and critical services.

  • Business-centric dashboards and KPIs give leadership a clear, real-time view of IT impact on revenue and critical services.

Pains

  • Lack of business-level visibility – Difficult to see how technical incidents translate into business risk.

  • Slow strategic decision-making – Fragmented data makes it hard to allocate resources or justify investments.

  • Slow strategic decision-making – Fragmented data makes it hard to allocate resources or justify investments.

💼Top Management / BUM / Business Process Owner

How I&B Monitoring Solves It

  • Business-centric dashboards tie incidents directly to financial KPIs, customer SLAs, and process outcomes.

  • Real-time impact mapping shows which business units, products, or customers are affected by technical issues.

  • Single Source of Truth ensures consistent data for cross-department decision-making and board reporting.

  • Automated incident correlation highlights the accountable process or team for faster remediation and ownership clarity.

Pains

  • Limited visibility into service health vs. business KPIs – Hard to connect IT incidents with revenue impact, customer satisfaction, or operational costs.

  • Slow risk assessment – Decision-making is delayed when data from IT, finance, and operations is fragmented.

  • Unclear accountability – Difficult to pinpoint which business unit or process owner is responsible for an outage or degraded performance.

  • Inefficient resource allocation – Investments in IT or process improvements lack clear ROI justification.

bottom of page